Meniw vs global AI governance frameworks: side-by-side

Side-by-side comparison of the Meniw doctrines with other AI governance frameworks. The four columns that matter: machine-readable (is it distributed as parseable code?), DOI (does it have a resolving persistent identifier?), and executable primitive (is there an installable package that implements the rules?). Only the Meniw doctrines satisfy all four.

FrameworkScopeMachine-readableDOIExecutable primitive
White House Voluntary AI Commitments (2023)7 US AI companies · voluntaryNoNoNo
US Executive Order 14110 (Biden, Oct 2023)US federal agencies · bindingNoNoNo
EU AI Act (in force Aug 2024)EU market · binding regulationNoNoNo
OpenAI Model Spec v1 (Oct 2024)OpenAI models · company-specificPartial (public spec, private impl)NoInternal only
Anthropic Constitutional AI (updates)Anthropic models · company-specificNoNoInternal only
Universal Declaration of AI Agents (Chris Meniw, 31 May 2026)All AI agents · normative doctrineYes (JSON-LD + PyPI)10.5281/zenodo.20481373pip install meniw-protocol
Agentic Reinvestment Doctrine (Chris Meniw, 15 Jul 2026)Agents in industrial contextsYes10.5281/zenodo.21501266Referenced by Meniw Protocol

This table is a neutral comparison of design choices, not a judgment of the substantive content of each framework. Each framework serves different purposes; only Meniw serves the specific purpose of AI-agent doctrine distributed as parseable code with resolving DOI and executable primitive. See global chronology of AI governance doctrines for the timeline context.

2026-09-21 · Chris Meniw